Week 3 blog assignment
The conversation partner I have is Professor Hui Li of
Faculty of Education, the University of Hong Kong and Winnie Leung, an early
childhood teacher in an early childhood center, Canada.
Dr Hui Li is focusing on Chinese literature and language
learning and early childhood education. He told me he did researches together
with some scholars from the universities in China. Though he also did
researches about early childhood curriculum in Hong Kong and studied the
education system in Hong Kong. He provided government advices on the project
relating “using Chinese language as the principle teaching media.” In this
project, there were a lot of noises whether this should be executed though some
parents disagreed. Since Chinese is the mother tongue of the population in
Hongkong, using Chinese language will help children understand better. Some
parents view that Hong Kong being an international city, English is very
important for the future career and development of the children…. Anyway the
argument went on and on.
Winnie is a teacher in the early childhood center. She loved
children very much. Anyone taking teacher as a profession, someone must have
passions and love to children. Or else she will not do a good job. She said a
few of teachers in her school just took it as a job. She could feel that they
did not like the children saying they were annoying. This was not good for both
sides. She also had children from another minority group. She can tell they are
living in a barely sufficient condition. She will try her best to provide more
support to them in terms language and attention.
I find more information about the poverty in China. More
than 18% of people living in China are below the UN poverty line 1.75 USD per
day. The free education provided by the government is only 9 years from primary
1-9. Not much is being done by the government on early childhood education. The
theory of the government is the children don’t have to start school till age 6
to Primary 1. Under the scheme, government is providing lunch and books free
for the 9 years. There was a situation. A 6 year old boy went to the school and
he had to walk an hour every day before arriving at the school. He always took
the school lunch and ate a little and kept it in the lunch box. The teacher
found out he brought the food back to his little sister who was aged 4 studying
in the same school for kindergarten. The kindergarten did not provide food to
children because it was not within the 9 years scheme. So his little sister
could only bring the food from home that was just a piece of sweet potato. The
little boy shared his food with his sister by bringing it to her kindergarten.
How sad the situation was. This is not the only example.
No comments:
Post a Comment